This page has moved. Click here to view.


Clinical Aspects of Depression

Women are at least twice as often get depressed as men, and even women when women are equal, which will not be in my lifetime, they will still have more depression than men. The four somatic symptoms could be any of the above, and I think that some of these everybody is going to be asking about, because most physicians would ask about weight gain, most would ask about sleep. This would come in but here are the things that might not be depresion, depression

Major depression, depending on what data you look at will be 2:1 or 3:1. If you look at seasonal affective disorder or seasonal depression, itís 4:1. There is a 5% lifetime prevalence, so itís one of the commonest diseases that we know of. That there are 10 -14 billion people in the

Depression has a huge rate of recurrence. It is a chronic disease so the treatment has to be modified to take that into consideration; because there was a lot of nonsense talked about it in terms of just what caused the depression and Iíll come to that in a minute. For instance, if you are a 50-year-old woman who has had, letís say, four depressions you have a

One of the things is that there is an incredible amount of use of emergency rooms and primary care physicians. Of course psychiatrists today, as opposed to 20-years-ago mostly see depressions after they have been to other doctors. So if we

The core morbidity problem is very interesting, because in our clinic about 60% of our patients with a diagnosis of major depression have a morbid medical illness. Seventy-percent of our patients with schizophrenia have a medical illness and we donít include obesity and we donít include tardive dyskinesia or addiction. If we cranked these in it would be

A word about medications that may be used for depression Ö there are really a tremendous number of them. I didnít attempt to

Differential diagnosis, this would be a depression, depresion, depresson, depressed, depresed, ECT, shock therapy, electroconvulsive therapy. I put this up because there is a tendency in the medicine, and even among certain psychiatrists, to think that if somebody has a severe trauma then you can understand that that might make them depressed. If I had a car wreck I am unlikely to be elated. On the other hand the important thing is that because you think you can understand that they might be depressed, if the patient meets the

Secondary depression would be important because we can have various organic disorders and they cause secondary depression. One of the things that might be included is that depression can begin at any age, from the teens or even before

Obviously dementia is another factor one would take in consideration because in many ways some of the things that are the insidious factors in depression, for instance if somebody loses a little bit of interest and doesnít concentrate quite as well and isnít as energetic as they would like to be, or they might have been, if you are 30 then people get alarmed and wonder whatís going on. If you are 70 people say, "Well, heís 70" and one must not do that because there are

The emphasis on major depression will be to make the appropriate diagnosis and to treat aggressively. This was perhaps more important in the days when people relied on tricyclics because people would say that the psycho-pharmacologist was somebody who went around and increased the dose of antidepressants and decreased the dose of antipsychotics. Because there was a tendency to underdose. With the newer SSRIís that is less of a problem. Given that the natural historyis would be true for people who had more than one episode.

In terms of the treatments that are available, there is pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy. A word about psychotherapy because much of this, the literature, has been diluted by some of the grandiose claims in the past that were unproven about psychotherapy, for whatever ails you, whether it was ulcerative colitis, or the sexual dysfunction. But in point of fact the

You could think of it that if you got very mild depression, you get better no matter what happens. So that if you go to your

We talked about past response, clearly if somebody responded in the past to a treatment, you are going to give it to them again. If thereís a family history of depression and they responded to brand X, then you would jump for brand X. The clinical subtype would really be that there are so-called anxious depressions, so-called atypical depressions and that some of

So this really takes us into selecting pharmaceuticals. Weíve got trazodone here, we have nefazodone and we have venlafaxine, which is both a drug that has an effect on norepinephrine and on serotonin. As you may recall, yesteryear there was a big controversy between the London group who felt that serotonin was the thing and the Boston group who felt it was norepinephrine, and they probably are both have a little bit of the truth. In point of fact, the drugs that have both an effect on serotonin and norepinephrine may well be the most potent, albeit the more difficult to use. I think most people use trazodone as a hypnotic or as optimistic thinking that might help getting erections. Very few people I know use it as an antidepressant. Nefazodone will be used a bit more often. Itís a very sedative-type drug and that can be

Tricyclics. The problem with them being thereís not a therapeutic window. Itís not as narrow as you would think in reading all of the recent studies. For instance, all of the new antidepressants go against imipramine and amitriptyline. Well, I donít know any psycho-pharmacologist who has used imipramine or amitriptyline, unless there is a special reason, in years. Because the secondary means like desipramine and nortriptyline have much less sedation and much less logy feeling and are equally efficacious and are easier to monitor. So in point of fact, nortriptyline would probably be peopleís drug of choice. What you have to say more is, that itís much easier to kill yourself with tricyclics and that

Thereís a whole range, thereís a couple of other ones out now, but I would just mention that probably you should learn to use one of two drugs. Thereís no data apart from that data to suggest that these drugs are any different from each

So while we are waiting for the data, I would not have a failure on Prozac and go on to Zoloft or go on to Paxil. If I failed in one, I would jump into a different group. Probably the group that we would recommend, because you are probably familiar with it from other areas, would be a drug like bupropion. Because it has a different mode of action. It has an effect on norepinephrine, it has some slight effects on dopamine. It is getting pushed quite a lot for smoking cessation, whereas it has a definite but modest effect, and it is more of a stimulating drug than some of the others. I think if someday you felt sure of your diagnosis and you were to use the paroxetine, if you gave somebody 20 mg of paroxetine and waited a month and nothing had happened, I would double the dose and go up to 40 and wait another 2-3 weeks. If nothing had happened by then, I would change. If you went through a six-week procedure again, a full dose of bupropion I would refer the

Drugs like venlafaxine have an effect both on serotonin and norepinephrine. It has a bit of a problem, since this is a multiple-dosing drug. These are drugs that you can give all at one time. Indeed, I have a colleague in England who used to give, when Prozac was coming out, he used to get patients in and give them the seven tablets in his office, and they never got any more Prozac until they came back the following week. So they are relatively safe drugs and of course fluoxetine is a very long-acting drug, which is both a plus and a minus. The reason why I didnít chose sertraline, which is Zoloft, is it is a multiple dosing drug and the dose of Zoloft is probably 200 mg for a lot of patients, so you go to 100 mg and wait. But you have a decision to make about increasing the dosage. We would tend to push the dosage up to 200 mg. Similarly, if you choose Prozac, even though there are early studies showing that thereís no difference between 20, 40 and 60 mg fluorite and the latest studies from the Mass. Medical Health Center suggest that if you go up to 40 mg a day of Prozac you will get a better result.

While venlafaxine is a multiple-dosing drug, there is now an extended release form available so it would be useful then to cut down on multiple dosing. But I would suggest you learn one of these drugs to get familiar with and either venlafaxine or bupropion. Mirtazepine is also on the market, but you may want to lay off it until you get a little more experience, even though the early data seems quite good.

The sedation is a problem with these drugs, but that can be used as an advantage. So many people will use nefazodone, particularly giving at bedtime. You donít have anticholinergic effects but we do have this. The priapism with the trazodone has been talked about a lot and clearly it is a real phenomenon, though rare. Bupropion, the effects I have mentioned. Bupropion, as I did mention, is used for smoke cessation. It is also used as a second line drug for treating attention deficit disorder. Some are suggesting that this stimulating effect is a real phenomenon. Here is venlafaxine.

Monamine oxidase inhibitors, as I mentioned, are very useful drugs with more data showing that they have an effect when other drugs fail, than any other second line treatment we have. But with the availability of all the other drugs and with the more complicating food regimens, we would suggest that you not use them at this moment. This branch of ET that I mentioned, we could mitigate up to 85 with drugs that clearly electroconvulsive therapy is still the most efficacious treatment that we have for severe depression. Itís the treatment that is underutilized and used to be said that only the poor got ECT and now itís only the rich that get ECT because many public institutions seem quite happy to say, "We never use ECT." Thatís a bit like saying, "We