This page has moved. Click here to view.
The cancer patient at times is quite prone to collapse and sudden death. When it occurs, it is usually on the basis of an arrhythmia. Not at all uncommonly, it is an independent event related to actual sclerotic disease and to the general disease of older people, or all of us, as we age. Nonetheless, its fair to say that many types of tumors, solid and hematologic, will involve the heart and its various substructures. A few examples in am going to amplify in a short while, involvement with the pericardium. But a few examples: for instance, it would amyloidosis in the context of, lets say, of multiple myeloma. An important infiltrate of cardiomyopathy. Marantic endocarditis often seen and usually produce the adenocarcinomas. Abnormalities of the valve leaflets and an infiltration of the myocardium in hypereosinophilias syndromes. And in the acute carcinoid crisis there can be cardiac collapse in the context of massive serotonin release. A little more about that in a few moments.
Now various modalities that are utilized in treatment for patients with cancer and at times can be implicated in causes for severe acute cardiac morbidity. In this case we are going to focus on radiation therapy, an important modality. We know for example that radiation can cause an acute pericarditis with the classical symptoms of pericarditis and an acute onset of a pericardial effusion. Radiation used more commonly rather than acute will result in a chronic pericarditis and a chronic pericardial effusion. Frequently occurring many months - even a couple of years - after the onset of therapy. In fact, its not uncommon to find this as an asymptomatic finding in patients who have had prior radiation therapy, if you are investigating
We know too that chemotherapy, not just radiation and not just the patients underlying cancer, but chemotherapy is an important cause of cardiac events that can lead to collapse and death. For example, a number of drugs will cause acute cardiac toxicity. Probably the best known among them for an acute and very severe cardiac toxicity is on cyclophosphamide. Cyclophosphamide or Cytoxan is an ubiquitously used alkylating agent of great value in many many cancers. It has tremendous utility in a number of high dose chemotherapy programs as a precursor to either autologous or stem cell infusions. But cyclophosphamide is capable of causing acute cardiomyopathy with pericarditis and pericardial effusion and occasionally life threatening arrhythmias. Probably more common is the category of anthracycline antibiotics. Anthracyclenes as you know are among the most useful anticancer drugs that we have. Probably the best known is Adriamycin, but there are cousins, structural cousins antarubicin and idarubicin and daunomycin which medicinally are quite similar. They can each upon effusion cause acute arrhythmias, not uncommonly ventricular premature beat and runs of v tach. Occasionally these can be lethal. The arrhythmogenic effects of the anthracyclenes are not dose dependent. Conversely, on the cardiomyopathy that results in congestive heart failure and certainly can be a cause of death in the cancer patient, is a chronic and dose dependent phenomenon. Generally 450 mg per square meter is considered the maximum threshold dose above which the incidence for heart failure rises with the use of these.
Now lets talk about pericardial tamponade. Why? Because it is indeed the most common manifestation in the heart of an urgent medical problem related to an underlying neoplasty. It is often quite insidious in its onset. Patients may feel just fatigued and nothing more specific. Its not uncommon that a patient with have abdominal complaints. Increased gaseousness, crampiness, thinking that they just have a persistent upset stomach. Some will have shortness of breath and others will have substernal chest pain. Although by no means is that a requirement. You will find the patient to be frequently tachycardic and have a variety of classical and telltales signs, such as the Kussmauls sign, which is venous neck vein distention upon deep inspiration as opposed to neck vein collapse, which is the usual. Tender cardiomegaly and a greater than 10 mm pulses paradoxus. Very often the tamponade syndrome appears acutely and suddenly but it really reflects a process that is quite chronic and insidious at its onset. The diseases that are most commonly associated with malignant pericardial involvement, pericardial effusions and tamponade, are listed here. Probably the most common is cancer of the lung. Why? Because it occurs in the mediastinum or in the lower thorax and it is probably the most common disease. Disproportionately represented are the leukemias and lymphomas, specifically Hodgkins and non-Hodgkins lymphomas also because of the
Pathophysiologically, as you know, there is on normal inspiration there is increased right heart filling, as depicted here, with enlargement of the right ventricle in particular as the intrapericardial pressure diminishes during inspiration. During the context of tamponade physiology, which is depicted in the left lower quadrant here, what you see is unlike the normal inspiration over here. You basically see a contracted ventricular space. The right
Now, what to do about this is fairly straightforward, however it requires skilled hands. I think it should not be left to the oncologist, or in fact the generalist who is not familiar with doing pericardiocenteisis unless the situation is absolutely urgent and a cardiologist is not around. At times it will present very acutely and formidably and there wont be a diagnosis, and a diagnosis is key. It is absolutely essential to figure out if the patient has got tamponade related to prior therapy, as in XRT, or is the tamponade occurring as a manifestation of progression of the disease. The
Now cardiac defects, in addition to infiltration of the pericardium or even the myocardium and damage to the myocardium from cytotoxic agents. The heart itself is also prone to being victimized by some of the tumoral substances that tumors secrete. A telltale one is associated with 5HT serotonin production by the carcinoid tumor. Commonly carcinoid tumors produce metastasis to the liver in such a context: if the tumor is a heavy secretor of serotonin or 5HIA there will be right-sided heart lesions that are produced. What one sees typically and readily is intimal and valvula thickening on the right side of the heart leading to tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonic stenosis. Very very dramatic presentations at times. This will lead to intractable and irreversible right sided congestive heart failure. So the only way to deal with this is to recognize it, number one - which means looking for it with an endo in the proper clinical context - and secondly the therapy needs to be directed with interfering with the affective dismediator. Thats difficult. Thats more easily said than done. Somatistat is often used to oppose the effect of serotonin, but ultimately this is extremely dangerous and not uncommonly, a fatal complication causing cardiac death. I should point out that every once in awhile, quite rarely, there is a syndrome in which the carcinoid is in the bronchus, bronchial carcinoid and that it draining into the left side of the heart. So you are going to see comparable lesions on the left side of the heart.
The other cardiac abnormality that occurs in the context of cancer that needs to be thought about - because it can precipitate acute cardiac type illness or hemodynamic crises or even sudden catastrophe - is high output cardiac failure. We see this of course in patients who in the context of their neoplasm or its therapy, or are profoundly anemic, occasionally you will see it in hyperthyroidism unrelated to cancer, and sometimes in those illnesses, like hematologic cancers that are associated with very very nasty splenomegaly, you can get internal shunting within the spleen and that will produce high output state. How do you figure this out? Well, for one thing, one has to be prepared to just consider this as a possibility. And echocardiogram might be useful to demonstrate the high output state. Its therapy of course relates to basically reversing it. Those parameters that are indeed reversible that are contributing to this, it first has to be recognized.
Lets move on a few millimeters from the heart to the lungs. Patients with malignant disease, as you know, have a plethora of pulmonary problems that can develop. Some of which will culminate or others of which will present with acute respiratory failure. When confronting such a patient a series of questions in virtually every case needs to be considered. Is the phenomenon you are observing related to the rest of the patients disease? That is fairly straightforward. Is there an opportunistic infection at work? We know that certain tumors paralyze the immune system, such as CLL for example. Multiple myelomas. When you add the impact of the therapy we apply to cancer which generally is quite damaging to T-cell function, most patients are ripe for opportunistic infection.
The therapies that we utilize, be it chemotherapy or radiation therapy, often will induce pulmonary damage as I will point out in a moment. Patients with cancer are particularly prone to thromboembolism, which of course is a source of possible acute respiratory collapse and even death. This slide depicts some treatment for related pulmonary complications that are worthy of your consideration in the context of patients who are presenting you with either chronic or acute respiratory problems. They come in several categories. The first is depicted as interstitial pneumonitis. Interstitial pneumonitis is absolutely drug related in some instances and it is related commonly to bleomycin. Probably the most fearsome side effect of this drug is interstitial pneumonitis. Other agents that will cause interstitial pneumonia are alkylating agents like BCNU, or busulfan also known as Myleran, which is a drug that has been commonly used for the treatment of chronic myelocytic leukemia. It is used less so now than it was before. Cyclophosphamide; we mentioned it a few moments ago as a potential for causing acute pericardial effusions and cardiomyopathy. It can also cause interstitial pneumonitis. These are patients who will present with a restrictive pulmonary defect on PITs. The DLCO is going to be diminished. The only way we can make this diagnosis is by lung biopsy. It is sometimes reversible and sometimes it is fatal no matter what we do.
Some patients in the context of cancer treatment will have a hypersensitivity reaction and this too can be related to either prior bleomycin or methotrexate exposure as well as carmustine, the drug that we commonly use in the treatment in Hodgkins disease. These patients however, unlike those with interstitial pneumonitis, will frequently have fever. Sometimes with eosinophilia. They benefit from steroids. A number of anti-cancer treatments are associated with non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema. A truly acute respiratory crisis. Probably the most common nowadays is the use of interleukin-2. High doses of interleukin-2, as you probably know, have found utility in the treatment of hypernephroma that is metastatic and malignant melanoma. It causes a vascular permeability syndrome with massive third spacing, including pulmonary edema. One can see similar things with Cytoxan and ara-AC although fortunately much less common. Occasionally leukoagglutinins that are contained within a unit of transfused blood will result in leukoagglutination within the lung and a vascular permeability syndrome that produces pulmonary edema. This is quite reversible. In fact, they are both quite reversible if the patient does support it.
Finally, pulmonary hemorrhage is a really acute catastrophe that the oncology patient finds him or herself in. Often associated with thrombocytopenia with a platelet count of less than 5,000. That usually is the considered cut-off at which the risk of serious hemorrhage of any type from any where is recognized - below 5,000. Or in the context of DIC which can either be a complication of sepsis or indeed can be secondary to an underlying, evolving neoplasm, like acute promyelocytic leukemia.
These are thromboembolic phenomenon that is in part indeed thromboembolic in origin and in part probably due to extrinsic impression of a great pain. Now the thing that is worth saying about this superior vena cava syndrome is that in all likelihood, in most cases Id say, its not really a true medical emergency. I call it a matter of medical urgency, but not so much emergency. Meaning, most people dont die because they have superior vena caval compression. But it does cry out for diagnosis for sure. And some patients with massive compression that has been acute, without much collateralization, indeed can have a facial suffusion here under the eyes, facial plethora and light-headedness and dizziness. In most patients this syndrome evolves rather insidiously before they come to the physician. The most frequent cause of this is primary lung cancer, pathogenic carcinoma. But malignant lymphomas, again, because they commonly involve mediastinal lymph nodes. Breast cancer because it commonly goes to the
Oncologic Emergencies
Therapy Related Sudden Death: XRT
Acute pericarditi
Chronic pericarditis-usually months or a few years after treatment
Pericardial effusion and tamponade
Coronary artery endarteritis-can result in MI, sudden death within a few years to many years after the therapy
Sudden Cardiac Death: Chemotherapy
Acute cardiotoxicity associated with a number of anti-neoplastic agents
Anthracyclines: Adriamycin, epirubicin, idarubicin, daunomyein-acute dysrhythmias are rare, can be lethal, are not dose dependent; chronic cardiomyopathy is more common, is close dependent
Cyclophosphamide: when used in high doses, as in BMT, associated with acute cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, pericardial effusion
Pericardial Tamponade/Pericardial Effusion
Differential Diagnosis
Primary Ca lung, Hodgkins Disease, NHL, leukemias
Breast Cancer-commonly involve the pericardium
Melanoma-most common tumor forming metastases in the heart
Malignant Pericardial Effusion/Tamponade: Clinical
Most common manifestation of malignant involvement of pericardium
Insidious: enlargement cardiac silhouette, ECG changes (low voltage), ECHO, CT
Dyspnea, +/- pain, fatigue, abdominal complaints, edema, cough, diaphoresis
Tachycardia, Kussmaul's sign, tender hepatomegaly, paradoxical pulse
Pericardial Tamponade: Dx
History is key: specific cancer dx, prior rx
Signs of sepsis vs not
Hypotension/shock
Kussmaul sign
Paradoxical pulse
ECHO-RV collapse
Pericardial Tamponade: Therapy
Emergent therapy occasionally needed: pericardiocentesis (dx and therapeutic
Prolonged drainage (overnight) may be therapeutic if used in conjunction with local (x-ray therapy) or systemic therapy
Pericardial window: rx of choice (6 mo. Prognosis)
Pericardial sclerosis: not used much
Pericardial stripping: Constrictive lesions as in post x-ray therapy
Cardiac Effects of Mediators Derived form Tumors
Carcinoid tumors with metastases to liver >right sided lesions; primary pulmonary carcinoid >left sided lesions
Intimal and valvular thickening; TR, PS
Culminates in irreversible right sided CHF
Therapy directed at reduction of the secretory cell mass; irreversible
High Output Cardiac States
Causes: anemia, hyperthyroidism, primary/secondary hyperaldosteronism, shunting through large tumors or organs (spleen)
Dx: think of it, ECHO to demo high output
RX: underlying cause, eg, anemia, thyroid status, hypoxia, etc
Pulmonary Complications
Sorting it out: the patient presents with cough, dyspnea, sometimes fever, and pulmonary infiltrates:
Is it tumor progression?
Is it opportunistic infection?
Is it therapy related?
Is it thromboembolic?
Pulmonary complications due to Therapeutic Modalities
Interstitial pneumonitis: methotrexate, bleomycin, Cytoxan, Busuifan, BCNU: restrictive defects, DLCO down, need BX
Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Bleomycin, methotrexate, procarbzine: fever sometimes, need biopsy--rx with steroids
Non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema: Cytoxan, ara-C, IL-2, methrotrxate, transfusion with leukoagglutinins, most patients will recover with supportive care, some will require intubation
Pulmonary hemorrhage: due to DIC, thrombocytopenia
Superior Vena Cava Syndrome
Not a true emergency Bronchogenic ca, Lymphoma, Breast Ca, Germ Cell tumors
Extrinsic compression/thrombosis
Venous distention, facial edema, telangiectasia, plethora, cyanosis
CT/CT angiogram for diagnosis is best
Surgery to make dx not contra-indicated
Chemotherapy (SCLC, lymphoma) or CT/XRT
Neurological Emergencies
Metastatic
Intracranial
Spinal
Leptomeningeal
Cranial/Peripheral nerves
Non-metastatic rx related vascular disorders toxic/metabolic paraneoplastic
Brain Metastases: Clinical
Most common neuro complication of cancer-infrequently is first manifestation (lung Ca)
Usually symptoms are a combination of mass effect due to combined consequences of tumor mass and edema-indistinguishable from primary brain tumor
Lung ca (#1), breast (#2), melanoma, renal cell ca
May be multiple, or singular
Brain Metastasis: Dx
Fifty percent are solitary
Signs relate to area of the lesion, and may be generalized, eg, seizures, personality change, obtundation
Must be verified histologically
MRI-Gd best test; large areas of edema
Differential Diagnosis: infectious masses, hemorrhage, with or w/o mass, primary brain tumor
Brain Metastasis: Therapy
Surgery: reserved for a single metastasis in a patient with good performance status, and therapeutic options for systemic disease, stable systemic disease
Surgery plus x-ray therapy for single met (up to 2 cm) yields best survival data for this subset (19 v 9 rues median)
For multiple metastases: x-ray therapy to whole brain plus decadron Stereotactic x-ray therapy: for delivering boost to large tumor mass
Systemic chemotherapy: usually of little value-blood brain barrier: new agents, eg, temazoiamide
Prognosis: guarded, and varies with underlying disease
Spinal Metastasis
Five percent all patients dying of cancer
Breast, lung, prostate, lymphoma are most common
Presenting finding in 4-22% Direct extension from a vertebral met
Can be by direct extension
T-spine most common location (T>LS>C)
Spinal Metastasis: pathophysiology
Demyelination, lipid-laden macrophages, interstitial edema, focal axonal swelling
Mechanical pressure causes impingement on venous flow in cord, producing conduction block and cord dysfunction
Infarction occurs late if at all
Spinal Metastasis: Clinical
Back pain 96%
Progressive, ? Radicular, worse when supine (disc disease improves when supine)
Exacerbated by coughing or flexing
Weakness-next most common after pain (P>D)
Bowel/bladder are late deficits
Sensory level
V. zoster eruption may occur at level of cord lesion
Spinal Metastasis: DX
Back pain in a ca pt=SCC until disproven
More than 50 percent collapse of a vertebrae highly correlated Myelopathy
Local or radicular pain
MRI best test (myelography as good)
MRI assists treatment planning
Spinal Mets: Therapy
Corticosteroids: oncolytic (lymphoma, breast ca, myeloma) reduce edema
Decadron: 10mg IV stat, then 96mg over 4 doses/day, x 11 days (MSKCC)
Radiation Therapy
Surgery: appropriate if no dx, or if lesion is in previously irradiated site
Spinal Mets: DDX
Epidural SCC
Leptomeningeal disease
Abscess
Epidural subdural hemorrhage
Lumbosacral plexopathy
Unrelated to cancer: spinal stenosis, disc disease, osteoporotic fx
Leptomeningeal Disease
Malignant cells enter subarachnoid space via bridging veins, or by direct extension
Blood vessels ensheathed by tumor, encasing cranial nerves, peripheral nerves
Pathophysiology: direct extension to nervous tissue, interfere with flow of CSF>hydrocephalus, vascular compromise, interfere with neuronal metabolism
Leptomeningeal Disease: Clinical
Synchronous symptoms and signs at multiple levels
Asymptomatic findings on exam
Headache, especially in AM, without brain metastases
Urinary incontinence may be an early sign, impotence
Leptomeningeal Disease: DX
Malignant cells in CSF
Head CT or MR (w/gad) prior to LP
Malignant cells in 50% at first LP; 3 samples >80% yield Almost always at least one abnormality on LP: pleocytosis, elev. protein, low glucose
Tumor markers: CEA (>1% serum), B-HCG, AFP, CA-125, CA15-3: rarely helpful
Leptomeningeal Disease: Rx
Often causes death within weeks to months
Responsive tumors do better
Radiation therapy: to symptomatic area
Chemotherapy: methotrexate IT-12-15 mg/dose >therapeutic levels for 36-48hrs, biw x 5, then qw till clearing
ara-C second line--depot formulations in study
Cerebrovascular Complications
Second to metastases
Cerebral hemorrhage: mets from melanoma, germ cell tumor, renal cell ca
Hemorrhage due to AML, APML, DIC
Venous thrombosis and infarction due to mass effect
NBTE-marantic endocarditis
Tumor Lysis Syndrome
Seen with tumors having high growth fraction, high cell turnover, large tumor cell mass, and responsive to therapy: Burkitts lymphoma, ALL, ANLL, CLL, CML,
Acute hyperuricemia, and metabolic derangements: rapid rise in uric acid, potassium, phosphate, hypocalcemia, arrhythmias, sudden death
Tumor Lysis Syndrome
Develops 1-2 days after cytotoxic therapy
N/V, lethargy, oliguria, CHF, seizures, arrhythmia
Uric acid crystals in urine
Therapy: focus on prevention=avoid drugs that inhibit tubular reabsorption of urate (thiazides, salicylates, contrast material), maintain dilate, alk. urine, achieve pH=7 in urine pre-rx, allopurinol
Ideally, hold therapy until uric acid normal, urine pH=7
Hypercalcemia of Malignancy
PTHRH, OAF, IL-6, PTH
Epithelial malignancies (PTHRH), myeloma (OAF, IL-6), Parathyroid Carcinoma
Direct resorption of bone by tumor cells mediated through cytokines
Often seen in absence of bone metastases
Hypercalcemia of Malignancy: Therapy
Fluids-all hypercalcemic patients are dehydrated-replete fluids
Commence furosemide only after fluid repletion