Click here to view next page of this article

 

FOOD HYPERSENSITIVITY AND ECZEMA 

Atopic dermatitis is one form of eczema, which begins in early infancy and is characterized by extreme pruritus, chronically relapsing course, and distinctive distribution. Atopic dermatitis is typically the first manifestation of a child prone to develop atopic disease, with 50% of all atopic dermatitis developing in the first year of life and 80% by 5 years of age. Approximately 80% of children with atopic dermatitis develop asthma or allergic rhinitis, with many losing their atopic dermatitis (AD) with the onset of respiratory allergy. The acute rash of AD is typically an erythematous, papulovesicular eruption.

FOOD HYPERSENSITIVITY AND ATOPIC DERMATITIS

Food hypersensitivity has a pathologic role in many children with atopic dermatitis. To establish the causative association between food hypersensitivity and AD, clinical studies have been performed to address t demonstrate that removal of the causative agent leads to resolution of the disorder; introduction of the causative agent provokes the disorder; and avoidance of the causative agent prevents the disorder.

The therapeutic effect of removing foods to which children with AD are allergic has been addressed in a number of studies. Atherton et al reported that two thirds of children with AD between the ages of 2 and 8 years showed marked improvement during a double-blind cross-over trial of egg and milk exclusion. The trial was conducted over a 12-week period in the patients' homes.

Allergic reactions to foods were very specific. Although patients frequently had positive skin tests [and RASTs] to several members of a botanical family or animal species, indicating immunologic cross-reactivity, the frequency of patients experiencing symptomatic intra-botanical or intra-species cross-reactivity is variable. Legume cross-reactivity was evaluated in 69 children with AD utilizing prick skin tests, in vitro measurements of specific IgE antibodies (immunodot blot) and Western blot analysis. Extensive immunologic cross-reactivity was demonstrated in skin prick tests, RASTs, and immunoblots in most patients; however, only 2 patients were symptomatic to more than one legume when challenged orally. Both patients had a history of severe allergic reactions to peanut and experienced mild reactions to a soy challenge, and both outgrew their reactivity to soy within 2 years. Similar studies with cereal grains showed significant IgE antibody cross-reactivity between grains (wheat, barley, rye, oat) and grass pollens but clinical cross-reactivity among the grains in only about 20% of patients. Although intra-species immunologic cross-reactivity is common, approximately 5% of egg-allergic children reacted to chicken, and about 10% of milk-allergic children reacted to beef. Consequently, the practice of avoiding all foods within a botanical family when one member is suspected of provoking allergic symptoms appears to be unwarranted. Interestingly, 90% of children allergic to cow's milk react to goat's milk, and approximately 40% of children reacting to beef also react to lamb.


TABLE 3 -- FOODS RESPONSIBLE FOR 80% OF POSITIVE CHALLENGES IN 470 PATIENTS WITH ATOPIC DERMATITIS
Food Positive Challenge Positive History Total %
Egg 178 35 213 57
Milk 96 47 143 38
Peanut 28 82 110 29
Soy 55 4 59 16
Wheat 43 0 43 11

Children with AD and newly diagnosed food hypersensitivity were found to have high spontaneous basophil histamine release (SBHR) from peripheral blood

A number of investigators have evaluated the effect of excluding dietary allergens on the development of AD in young infants. In the 1930s Grulee and Sanford were first to report a decrease in the incidence of AD in breastfed infants.  Since that time there have been numerous conflicting reports about the relative benefit of breast feeding infants to prevent or delay the onset of atopic disease. The potential benefit of breastfeeding is complicated by transmission of food antigens in maternal breast milk. We evaluated six exclusively breastfed infants (age 2.5 to 6 months) who developed classic infantile AD. Each infant had a positive prick skin test to egg and experienced complete clearing of eczematous lesions when their mothers totally eliminated egg-containing foods from their diet. Four of the six infants were challenged on a clinical research unit by first feeding their mothers eggs and then having their mothers breastfeed. All infants developed an eczematous rash 4 to 36 hours after their mothers ingested eggs. This evidence and findings from other studies support the practice of placing selected mothers on

In a prospective, randomized allergy prevention trial, Zeiger et al compared the benefits of maternal and infant food allergen avoidance on the prevention of allergic disease in infants at high risk for allergic disease. Breastfeeding was encouraged in both prophylaxis and control groups. In the prophylaxis group, mothers eliminated egg, milk, and peanut from their diets, a casein hydrolysate formula was utilized for supplementation or weaning, and solid foods were delayed until 6 months. In the control group, mothers' diets were unrestricted, infants received cow milk formula for supplementation or weaning, and the American Academy of Pediatrics

In families at high risk for atopic disorders, however, it would seem prudent to avoid exposing young infants to food allergens that provoke lifelong sensitization (e.g., peanuts, nuts, fish, or shellfish) for the first 2 to 3 years of life. In highly motivated "high-risk" families, avoidance of cow's milk for the first year and egg for the first 2 years may prevent some AD and food allergy. Mothers of high-risk infants might also be prudent to avoid peanuts, nuts, fish, and shellfish while breastfeeding and perhaps even during the third trimester of pregnancy because these foods do not generally comprise a major part of the diet. Whether it is beneficial for all lactating mothers in high-risk families to avoid milk and eggs remains

DIAGNOSIS OF FOOD HYPERSENSITIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH ATOPIC DERMATITIS

The double-blind placebo controlled oral food challenge remains the gold standard for diagnosing food hypersensitivity in chronic atopic disorders, such as AD. In the typical office practice, however, a careful history and evidence of food antigen-specific IgE antibodies (prick skin tests, RASTs) may indicate foods that can be eliminated for a 2- to 3-week dietary trial. Symptoms may be recorded in a diary during the trial period. If unequivocal improvement is documented, foods believed to be least likely to be responsible for reactions (e.g., foods other than egg, peanut, milk, soy, and wheat) are added back to the diet; however, any food suspected of causing a severe anaphylactic reaction should never be administered at home because of the potential for inducing anaphylactic shock. If a clear deterioration in the patient's AD occurs when a food is added back, it should be removed from the diet. If cause and effect can be established, the patient should remain on the avoidance diet unless it requires elimination of more than one major food (egg, milk, soy, or wheat) or two or more minor foods (all others). If severe symptoms persist on the

A recent study compared the results of DBPCFCs in 196 children and adolescents with AD to the concentrations of food-specific IgE antibodies determined with the Pharmacia CAP System FEIA (Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden) (reported in kU/L). Levels of food-specific IgE indicating the positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values for the test were calculated based on the outcome of the challenges. For egg, milk, peanut, and codfish allergies, diagnostic levels.